Log in or become a subscriber

This content requires a basic HR Daily subscription. Log in below or sign up for free.

"Candid" HR evidence highlights performance management flaws

HR's role in a performance review and management process was "worthy of scrutiny", the Fair Work Commission has noted, in ordering an employer to reinstate a senior employee.

"Despite the issues of [the director's] alleged leadership deficiencies being known, there is little evidence of intervention by HR to address those issues in a meaningful way," Deputy President Masson said.

The Commission heard the University of Melbourne sacked the director after an 18-month investigation and disciplinary process found she'd engaged in serious misconduct.

But in unfair dismissal proceedings, Deputy President Masson rejected that the director's behaviour was "rude and disrespectful, micromanaging and controlling, dishonest, divisive, insubordinate, and bullying", as the employer contended...

Log in or become a subscriber
Subscriber login

Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.

Haven't seen HR Daily before?

Sign up now for your free HR Daily newsletter subscription.

Join here to stay informed

Written specifically for human resources practitioners, our articles will keep you informed about all the important HR news, thought leadership and trends. You'll receive:

Access to all our free editorial Four-plus new articles each week Excerpts from our compliance and best-practice webcasts Event invitations And much more