This content requires a basic HR Daily subscription. Log in below or sign up for free.
Due to its "misconceived" notion of casual employment rights, an employer now has to face a worker's general protections claim.
The casual employee of B&R Recruitment Group Pty Ltd, who was performing work at an Australian Agribusiness site, was told in July that his services were no longer required.
He lodged a general protections claim involving dismissal, to which the employer objected on the grounds it hadn't dismissed him.
Commissioner Nicholas Wilson noted that the employer's objection, "succinctly stated", was that because the worker was a casual employee, his "employment could be finished up at any time"...
Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.
Sign up now for your free HR Daily newsletter subscription.
Written specifically for human resources practitioners, our articles will keep you informed about all the important HR news, thought leadership and trends. You'll receive:
Access to all our free editorial Four-plus new articles each week Excerpts from our compliance and best-practice webcasts Event invitations And much more