Log in or become a subscriber

This content requires a basic HR Daily subscription. Log in below or sign up for free.

'Essential worker' clarity needed ahead of future crises

Australia needs to develop a clear definition of 'essential workers', to provide clarity for employers in the event of another crisis such as the COVID pandemic, an inquiry recommends.

Inconsistent and changing definitions of essential workers across governments created widespread confusion, according to the independent inquiry into Australia's response to the COVID-19 pandemic, conducted by Robyn Kruk AO, Professor Catherine Bennett, and Dr Angela Jackson.

"While the terms 'essential', 'frontline' and 'key' worker became part of the everyday lexicon, these terms are not defined in Australian Government legislation or consistently defined or coordinated across jurisdictions. Some states did have legal definitions, but these were not designed for a pandemic," the panel says in its 877-page report, released today...

Log in or become a subscriber
Subscriber login

Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.

Haven't seen HR Daily before?

Sign up now for your free HR Daily newsletter subscription.

Join here to stay informed

Written specifically for human resources practitioners, our articles will keep you informed about all the important HR news, thought leadership and trends. You'll receive:

Access to all our free editorial Four-plus new articles each week Excerpts from our compliance and best-practice webcasts Event invitations And much more