Log in or become a subscriber

This content requires a basic HR Daily subscription. Log in below or sign up for free.

HR's narrow involvement in AI decision-making a "structural risk"

A new report warns against limiting the role of HR teams in AI decision-making, as more organisations place AI adoption exclusively in the hands of chief AI officers.

According to Datacom's report on the emerging role of chief AI officer in Australia, based on a survey of more than 500 business and IT leaders, about two in three Australian organisations will have a dedicated AI officer at exec-level by the start of next year.

"However, organisations remain divided over where the role should sit, what it should prioritise, and how its accountabilities should sit alongside those of the CIO, CTO, CISO and other functional leaders," the report says. This could jeopardise the AI officer's ability to change how the organisation works, it notes, which should be the main point of their role.

The report says that while AI decision-making is currently dominated by the technology (77%) and data (65%) functions, it's not confined to them. Operations (42%), policy/legal/compliance (26%), business units (24%), HR/people (21%), and finance (21%) also play a part in decision-making, as do external partners (7%)...

Log in or become a subscriber
Subscriber login

Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.

Haven't seen HR Daily before?

Sign up now for your free HR Daily newsletter subscription.

Join here to stay informed

Written specifically for human resources practitioners, our articles will keep you informed about all the important HR news, thought leadership and trends. You'll receive:

Access to all our free editorial Four-plus new articles each week Excerpts from our compliance and best-practice webcasts Event invitations And much more