Log in or become a subscriber

This content requires a basic HR Daily subscription. Log in below or sign up for free.

In settlements, there's "no substitute for clearly recorded written terms"

"Expedition and informality" are desirable in industrial relations litigation, but when it comes to termination settlements, "there can be no substitute for clearly recorded written terms of agreement", a commission has highlighted.

The case at hand, in which an employer sought to finalise a dismissal dispute based on mutual agreement, "stands as yet another cautionary tale about the potential pitfalls of insufficient care being taken by parties to properly document a settlement", said NSW Industrial Relations Commissioner Anthony Howell.

The former registered nurse had lodged a dispute in December 2024, alleging her dismissal from Westmead Children's Hospital earlier that month was unfair.

As the nominal employer, the NSW Health Secretary filed a notice of motion on 1 July 2025 seeking orders dismissing or permanently staying the proceedings. It did so on the basis that a binding settlement had been reached in April...

Log in or become a subscriber
Subscriber login

Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.

Haven't seen HR Daily before?

Sign up now for your free HR Daily newsletter subscription.

Join here to stay informed

Written specifically for human resources practitioners, our articles will keep you informed about all the important HR news, thought leadership and trends. You'll receive:

Access to all our free editorial Four-plus new articles each week Excerpts from our compliance and best-practice webcasts Event invitations And much more