Log in or become a subscriber

This content requires HR Daily Premium membership. Log in below or sign up here.

Wrong principle stated in D&A dismissal ruling, but reinstatement stands

A Fair Work Commission Deputy President was wrong to state that an employer had to demonstrate a risk of impairment when dismissing a worker who failed a dr-g test, but this didn't affect his overall finding that the sacking was harsh, a full bench has ruled.

The bench also set out some crucial elements to include in drug and alcohol policies and training, to reduce the likelihood of disciplinary action being deemed unfair.

The Sydney Trains work group leader was sacked in September 2022 after a random drug test showed he had cocaine metabolites in his system. The employee claimed that four days earlier, while on approved leave, he had tried cocaine for the first time with some friends and wasn't aware it might be detected after he returned to work...

Log in or become a subscriber
Subscriber login

Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.

HR Daily Premium membership

Sign up now for all the benefits of HR Daily Premium membership.

Join here to stay informed

HR Daily Premium members are Australia's best-informed HR leaders and practitioners when it comes to HR news, thought leadership, legal compliance and emerging trends. Unlock premium membership to receive:

Full access to our news library Breaking news updates each day Complimentary passes to all webinars Webcasts streaming on demand Q&A sessions on hot topics And much more