This content requires HR Daily Premium membership. Log in below or sign up here.
A Fair Work Commission member was wrong to dismiss a stop-bullying application based on the assumption that an employee who was absent and unfit for duties faced no continuing risk of bullying, a full bench has ruled.
"An application should only be dismissed at a preliminary stage, or without determining the bullying allegations, where the absence of a future risk of bullying is clear," the bench said.
The case involved a stop-bullying application filed by an Excelsia University College academic. She has been absent from work, receiving workers' compensation, since mid-2025.
During a 'report back conference' in March this year, Deputy President Gerard Boyce dismissed the employee's application. An email sent shortly after the phone call referred to the employee's latest medical certificate, which stated she had "NIL capacity for work"...
Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.
Sign up now for all the benefits of HR Daily Premium membership.
HR Daily Premium members are Australia's best-informed HR leaders and practitioners when it comes to HR news, thought leadership, legal compliance and emerging trends. Unlock premium membership to receive:
Full access to our news library Breaking news updates each day Complimentary passes to all webinars Webcasts streaming on demand Q&A sessions on hot topics And much more