Log in or become a subscriber

This content requires HR Daily Premium membership. Log in below or sign up here.

Common HR tactic to mitigate adverse action risks isn't working

It's becoming increasingly difficult for employers to defend general protections claims, according to a lawyer calling on HR to apply more rigour in all termination processes.

Not only do employers need to meet the strict onus of proving they didn't engage in unlawful adverse action, they're almost guaranteed to lose if they fail to identify all the people in the decision-making chain, says Dentons partner Paul O'Halloran.

When employers lose these cases it's often because they haven't called "material witnesses" who contributed to decisions in some way, he tells HR Daily.

"They haven't properly recognised the scope of decision-makers they should be calling to give evidence..."

Log in or become a subscriber
Subscriber login

Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.

HR Daily Premium membership

Sign up now for all the benefits of HR Daily Premium membership.

Join here to stay informed

HR Daily Premium members are Australia's best-informed HR leaders and practitioners when it comes to HR news, thought leadership, legal compliance and emerging trends. Unlock premium membership to receive:

Full access to our news library Breaking news updates each day Complimentary passes to all webinars Webcasts streaming on demand Q&A sessions on hot topics And much more