Log in or become a subscriber

This content requires HR Daily Premium membership. Log in below or sign up here.

Court ruling highlights general protections regime is a "different beast"

An employer that failed to take any steps to review its procedures after a court found it engaged in unlawful adverse action has been ordered to pay an employee $30k in compensation and penalties.

It was, "on one level", understandable that the employer believed it had nothing to reflect on, given its view that its contravention was based on a decision-maker "technicality", Federal Circuit Court Judge Catherine Symons noted.

But she found its failure to revisit its procedures and to consider "what, if anything, might be done differently or improved in the future" indicated there was "a modest need for specific deterrence" when determining penalty.

The case involved an aged care nurse practitioner employed by Alfred Health in its mobile assessment and treatment service. She ceased work in late 2018, and successfully sought workers' compensation for a psychological injury, which she claimed was caused by workplace bullying and a supervisor's failure to properly manage colleagues' behaviour...

Log in or become a subscriber
Subscriber login

Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.

HR Daily Premium membership

Sign up now for all the benefits of HR Daily Premium membership.

Join here to stay informed

HR Daily Premium members are Australia's best-informed HR leaders and practitioners when it comes to HR news, thought leadership, legal compliance and emerging trends. Unlock premium membership to receive:

Full access to our news library Breaking news updates each day Complimentary passes to all webinars Webcasts streaming on demand Q&A sessions on hot topics And much more