This content requires HR Daily Premium membership. Log in below or sign up here.
In neglecting to provide clear evidence of who initiated serious misconduct allegations against an employee, an employer has failed to prove it didn't take unlawful adverse action against her.
In neglecting to provide clear evidence of who initiated serious misconduct allegations against an employee, an employer has failed to prove it didn't take unlawful adverse action against her.
The University of Melbourne employee was dismissed on grounds of redundancy in February 2020. She subsequently claimed the employer had taken four unlawful adverse actions against her – specifically in making her role redundant, dismissing her, accusing her of serious misconduct, and issuing her a final written warning – because of her history of workplace complaints...
Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.
Sign up now for all the benefits of HR Daily Premium membership.
HR Daily Premium members are Australia's best-informed HR leaders and practitioners when it comes to HR news, thought leadership, legal compliance and emerging trends. Unlock premium membership to receive:
Full access to our news library Breaking news updates each day Complimentary passes to all webinars Webcasts streaming on demand Q&A sessions on hot topics And much more