Log in or become a subscriber

This content requires HR Daily Premium membership. Log in below or sign up here.

Emailed "concerns" weren't a workplace complaint or inquiry

The short time between an employee's email request and her dismissal wasn't proof of unlawful adverse action, the Federal Circuit Court has found.

She was due for a probation review at the time, Judge Mark Cleary accepted, but in any case, he said he would have found her dismissal was "based solely on concerns about her performance".

The employee started working as a marketing executive for EzyRemit Worldwide on 26 September 2024, and was sacked just shy of six months later, on 24 March 2025.

In adverse action proceedings, she told the Court she had emailed the employer three days earlier, on 21 March, about "superannuation contributions and inaccuracies in ATO employment records"...

Log in or become a subscriber
Subscriber login

Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.

HR Daily Premium membership

Sign up now for all the benefits of HR Daily Premium membership.

Join here to stay informed

HR Daily Premium members are Australia's best-informed HR leaders and practitioners when it comes to HR news, thought leadership, legal compliance and emerging trends. Unlock premium membership to receive:

Full access to our news library Breaking news updates each day Complimentary passes to all webinars Webcasts streaming on demand Q&A sessions on hot topics And much more