Log in or become a subscriber

This content requires HR Daily Premium membership. Log in below or sign up here.

Worker's defence of aggressive behaviour was "nonsensical"

It was "nonsensical" for an employee to argue that he was abusive and threatening towards a member of the public because he was concerned about workplace safety, the Fair Work Commission has ruled.

The employee also failed to accept the seriousness of his actions, Deputy President Bryce Cross found, noting his only concessions or expressions of genuine remorse were "guarded and conditional".

In May this year, the Australian Football League sacked the elite umpires coach for breaching its code of conduct, after receiving a complaint from a runner who had attempted to use North Sydney Oval during a training session the month prior.

In unfair dismissal proceedings, the Commission heard the employee approached the runner and asked him to leave, as the oval was a "closed venue" at that time.

CCTV footage showed the employee continually blocking the man's path as he tried to resume running. Frustrations increased, and the runner grabbed the employee on the shoulder...

Log in or become a subscriber
Subscriber login

Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.

HR Daily Premium membership

Sign up now for all the benefits of HR Daily Premium membership.

Join here to stay informed

HR Daily Premium members are Australia's best-informed HR leaders and practitioners when it comes to HR news, thought leadership, legal compliance and emerging trends. Unlock premium membership to receive:

Full access to our news library Breaking news updates each day Complimentary passes to all webinars Webcasts streaming on demand Q&A sessions on hot topics And much more