Log in or become a subscriber

This content requires HR Daily Premium membership. Log in below or sign up here.

Employee who "clearly needed more support" wins psych injury claim

A medical opinion stating it was "possible" that a disciplinary meeting "may have had an impact" on an employee's psychological condition did not come close to clearing her employer of liability for the injury, a tribunal has found.

NSW Personal Injury Commission Principal Member Josephine Bamber found the employer hadn't discharged its onus of proving the injury was a result of disciplinary action or performance appraisal; rather, it was predominantly caused by interpersonal conflict.

The Bunnings Group Limited casual employee sought compensation for aggravation of a pre-existing adjustment disorder, which she claimed was caused by victimisation, harassment and bullying by her managers.

The employer accepted she had sustained a psychological injury, however argued it resulted from reasonable disciplinary action. It also disagreed that she had suffered any incapacity for employment...

Log in or become a subscriber
Subscriber login

Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.

HR Daily Premium membership

Sign up now for all the benefits of HR Daily Premium membership.

Join here to stay informed

HR Daily Premium members are Australia's best-informed HR leaders and practitioners when it comes to HR news, thought leadership, legal compliance and emerging trends. Unlock premium membership to receive:

Full access to our news library Breaking news updates each day Complimentary passes to all webinars Webcasts streaming on demand Q&A sessions on hot topics And much more