Log in or become a subscriber

This content requires HR Daily Premium membership. Log in below or sign up here.

Employer "at its wits end" failed to follow fair dismissal process

An employer was entitled to sack an employee for his "repeated poor performance, bad punctuality and unexplained absenteeism", but its procedural failings made the dismissal unfair, the Fair Work Commission has found.

In unfair dismissal proceedings, Flick Anticimex told the Commission it sacked the pest technician in April this year because of "genuine" performance and attendance issues, and for "fraud", in the form of falsifying work records.

It claimed, for example, that on 4 April the employee had only actioned two of six scheduled jobs and, when asked what he'd been doing all day, he said he was "trying to find parking and it was raining"...

Log in or become a subscriber
Subscriber login

Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.

HR Daily Premium membership

Sign up now for all the benefits of HR Daily Premium membership.

Join here to stay informed

HR Daily Premium members are Australia's best-informed HR leaders and practitioners when it comes to HR news, thought leadership, legal compliance and emerging trends. Unlock premium membership to receive:

Full access to our news library Breaking news updates each day Complimentary passes to all webinars Webcasts streaming on demand Q&A sessions on hot topics And much more