Log in or become a subscriber

This content requires HR Daily Premium membership. Log in below or sign up here.

Employer fails to prove retirement-related flex work request wasn't valid

An employee's flexible work request was sufficiently related to his age, the Fair Work Commission has found, in rejecting he was seeking "open-ended optimisation of his working arrangements" rather than transitioning to retirement.

Dismissing the employer's jurisdictional objection, Commissioner Chris Simpson accepted the employee had established the required nexus under section 65(1)(b) of the Fair Work Act.

In January this year, the Watpac Construction services manager told his supervisor he was "restructuring" certain aspects of his life, so he could dedicate more time to creative writing and make this a source of income throughout his retirement. He proposed maintaining his contractual hours, but working only four days a week.

He formalised his flexible work request a few days later, submitting that it met the section 65 criteria because he was over 55 years of age and wanted to transition to retirement by improving his work-life balance and pursuing creative projects...

Log in or become a subscriber
Subscriber login

Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.

HR Daily Premium membership

Sign up now for all the benefits of HR Daily Premium membership.

Join here to stay informed

HR Daily Premium members are Australia's best-informed HR leaders and practitioners when it comes to HR news, thought leadership, legal compliance and emerging trends. Unlock premium membership to receive:

Full access to our news library Breaking news updates each day Complimentary passes to all webinars Webcasts streaming on demand Q&A sessions on hot topics And much more