Log in or become a subscriber

This content requires HR Daily Premium membership. Log in below or sign up here.

Employer fails to win interlocutory restraint after clients follow employee to competitor

Simply "responding positively" to an approach from a former client doesn't amount to solicitation, a court has highlighted, in refusing to restrain an employee accused of breaching his employment contract.

Queensland Supreme Court Chief Justice Helen Bowskill also found that the broad terms of the restraint provisions in the employee's contract would likely face "real challenges" to their enforceability if the case went to a full hearing.

The Court was hearing an application by Perpetual Limited for an interim order restraining one of its former senior financial advisers from soliciting its clients after he left...

Log in or become a subscriber
Subscriber login

Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.

HR Daily Premium membership

Sign up now for all the benefits of HR Daily Premium membership.

Join here to stay informed

HR Daily Premium members are Australia's best-informed HR leaders and practitioners when it comes to HR news, thought leadership, legal compliance and emerging trends. Unlock premium membership to receive:

Full access to our news library Breaking news updates each day Complimentary passes to all webinars Webcasts streaming on demand Q&A sessions on hot topics And much more