Log in or become a subscriber

This content requires HR Daily Premium membership. Log in below or sign up here.

Employer's response to 'bizarre' behaviour was reasonable, psych claim rejected

It was reasonable to ask an employee to take a D&A test after he was reported behaving erratically at work, a commission has ruled in rejecting his psychological injury claim.

NSW Personal Injury Commission Member Rachel Homan found the requirement was part of a wider disciplinary process, and its reasonableness meant the employer wasn't liable for his psychological injury.

The Rix Group welder and fabricator sought workers' compensation for an adjustment disorder, but the employer's insurer denied liability on the basis that his injury was caused by reasonable action taken with respect to discipline.

Applying to the Commission to resolve a dispute, the employee argued neither of the two events to which he attributed his injury fell within the "discipline" exemption...

Log in or become a subscriber
Subscriber login

Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.

HR Daily Premium membership

Sign up now for all the benefits of HR Daily Premium membership.

Join here to stay informed

HR Daily Premium members are Australia's best-informed HR leaders and practitioners when it comes to HR news, thought leadership, legal compliance and emerging trends. Unlock premium membership to receive:

Full access to our news library Breaking news updates each day Complimentary passes to all webinars Webcasts streaming on demand Q&A sessions on hot topics And much more