This content requires HR Daily Premium membership. Log in below or sign up here.
An employer's decision to dismiss a worker who had been absent for nearly two years was based on "assumptions or incomplete information", the Fair Work Commission has found.
The employer "had a basic duty of care to ensure that [it] had all relevant information on hand prior to terminating her employment", yet inexplicably hadn't received a report that stated she was fit to perform her pre-injury duties, Commissioner Paul Schneider noted.
The Warwick Fabrics sales manager fractured her foot in August 2022 when leaving a client site. She was then absent from work until her termination in July 2024.
She claimed there was no valid reason for her dismissal and it was therefore unfair...
Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.
Sign up now for all the benefits of HR Daily Premium membership.
HR Daily Premium members are Australia's best-informed HR leaders and practitioners when it comes to HR news, thought leadership, legal compliance and emerging trends. Unlock premium membership to receive:
Full access to our news library Breaking news updates each day Complimentary passes to all webinars Webcasts streaming on demand Q&A sessions on hot topics And much more