Log in or become a subscriber

This content requires HR Daily Premium membership. Log in below or sign up here.

Employment ended when court order "frustrated" contract

An apprehended domestic violence order that prohibited an employee from contacting her manager "frustrated" her employment contract, the Fair Work Commission has ruled in concluding she wasn't dismissed.

Deputy President Tony Saunders noted the relevant test for determining if a contract had been frustrated was whether it had "become incapable of being performed because the circumstances in which performance is called for would render it a thing radically different from that which was undertaken by the contract".

And if a contract was frustrated, "it comes 'ipso facto to an end' – that is, without any action by the parties to terminate it", he said.

The Fire Stopping administrative assistant claimed unfair dismissal in March this year, but the employer objected on the basis it didn't sack her; rather, her employment ended due to the frustration of her contract...

Log in or become a subscriber
Subscriber login

Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.

HR Daily Premium membership

Sign up now for all the benefits of HR Daily Premium membership.

Join here to stay informed

HR Daily Premium members are Australia's best-informed HR leaders and practitioners when it comes to HR news, thought leadership, legal compliance and emerging trends. Unlock premium membership to receive:

Full access to our news library Breaking news updates each day Complimentary passes to all webinars Webcasts streaming on demand Q&A sessions on hot topics And much more