This content requires HR Daily Premium membership. Log in below or sign up here.
Employees must establish a clear nexus between their obligations as parents of school-age children and their desired working arrangements, rather than simply rely on their parenting status, if they expect to win disputes over flexible work refusals, a new ruling shows.
Fair Work Commission Deputy President Lyndall Dean accepted that the employee had two school-aged children and shared parental responsibilities with his wife, but noted there was no evidence to demonstrate that he was required to work from home two days per week, as he had requested, in order to meet those responsibilities.
In determining the technical specialist's dispute over the denial of his request by healthcare software provider Intersystems Australia, she heard that since the pandemic, the employer had allowed all staff to work from home two days per week.
This changed in November 2024, when the employer advised that starting from 1 February 2025, it would require everyone – with the exception of one department – to resume working solely in its office...
Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.
Sign up now for all the benefits of HR Daily Premium membership.
HR Daily Premium members are Australia's best-informed HR leaders and practitioners when it comes to HR news, thought leadership, legal compliance and emerging trends. Unlock premium membership to receive:
Full access to our news library Breaking news updates each day Complimentary passes to all webinars Webcasts streaming on demand Q&A sessions on hot topics And much more