Log in or become a subscriber

This content requires HR Daily Premium membership. Log in below or sign up here.

From case to culture: Conflict highlights need for clear behaviour expectations

The case of an employee who denied his messages about "love" to a colleague had any s-xual element raises broader issues for HR around communication and intent across different work cohorts, a conflict specialist says.

The 63-year-old employee was sacked for sexual harassment after he sent emojis (including a red lipstick kiss, thumbs up and two people kissing) and messages (saying "I love you" and "Be my valentine", among others), to a 28-year-old colleague.

The employee claimed his intent was friendly, not sexual, arguing that "I love you" was "part of the workplace banter" used by his younger colleagues, but the Fair Work Commission disagreed. (Read HR Daily's full report on the decision here.)

According to The Zalt Group director Zandy Fell, it's not uncommon for misunderstandings to arise when there's an "intergenerational layer" to workplace interactions...

Log in or become a subscriber
Subscriber login

Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.

HR Daily Premium membership

Sign up now for all the benefits of HR Daily Premium membership.

Join here to stay informed

HR Daily Premium members are Australia's best-informed HR leaders and practitioners when it comes to HR news, thought leadership, legal compliance and emerging trends. Unlock premium membership to receive:

Full access to our news library Breaking news updates each day Complimentary passes to all webinars Webcasts streaming on demand Q&A sessions on hot topics And much more