This content requires HR Daily Premium membership. Log in below or sign up here.
In deciding not to make stop-bullying orders, the Fair Work Commission doesn't "in all cases" need to first determine whether bullying has occurred, if it considers a current employee is not at risk of such conduct in the future, a full bench has confirmed.
The appropriateness of dealing with the "future risk element" of the Fair Work Act's stop-bullying provisions as a "threshold matter" would depend on the circumstances of each case, the bench said.
In October last year, a National Disability Insurance Agency senior fraud officer sought stop-bullying orders against two managers. He alleged they: "inaccurately" accused him of working outside his remit; suppressed his ideas; excessively scrutinised him; provided unjustified criticism; and engaged in "unprofessional grumbling and intimidation".
But the employer defended the managers, noting they gave him feedback on his performance, clarified his role's remit, and reinforced expectations, all of which constituted reasonable management action taken in a reasonable manner...
Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.
Sign up now for all the benefits of HR Daily Premium membership.
HR Daily Premium members are Australia's best-informed HR leaders and practitioners when it comes to HR news, thought leadership, legal compliance and emerging trends. Unlock premium membership to receive:
Full access to our news library Breaking news updates each day Complimentary passes to all webinars Webcasts streaming on demand Q&A sessions on hot topics And much more