Log in or become a subscriber

This content requires HR Daily Premium membership. Log in below or sign up here.

FWC draws distinction between "acceptable" and "preferred" redeployment

Despite initially offering voluntary redundancy as an option, an employer wasn't required to pay out a worker when it had acceptable redeployment alternatives available, the Fair Work Commission has ruled.

Deputy President Nicholas Lake noted that employees are "not owed a redundancy if there are workable redeployment options, even if these options are not preferred".

"Acceptable alternate employment does not mean acceptable to the employee in the sense that they get exactly what they want. It is assessed on an objective basis," he added.

Log in or become a subscriber
Subscriber login

Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.

HR Daily Premium membership

Sign up now for all the benefits of HR Daily Premium membership.

Join here to stay informed

HR Daily Premium members are Australia's best-informed HR leaders and practitioners when it comes to HR news, thought leadership, legal compliance and emerging trends. Unlock premium membership to receive:

Full access to our news library Breaking news updates each day Complimentary passes to all webinars Webcasts streaming on demand Q&A sessions on hot topics And much more