This content requires HR Daily Premium membership. Log in below or sign up here.
An employee's request for a flexible working arrangement was completely misaligned with peak demand for the work she performed, the Fair Work Commission has accepted.
The employee didn't seriously challenge the employer's evidence supporting its business grounds for refusing her request, Deputy President Bryce Cross noted. Rather, her position was that notwithstanding those grounds, "her requests should nonetheless somehow be accommodated".
The part-time aviation screening officer for Certis Security Australia, which provides passenger screening services at Sydney Airport, sought a flexible working arrangement based on her status as a carer – of two school-age children, her elderly, ill and frail father, and her brother, who has a disability.
After the employer refused, she applied to the Commission for an order under section 65C of the Fair Work Act...
Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.
Sign up now for all the benefits of HR Daily Premium membership.
HR Daily Premium members are Australia's best-informed HR leaders and practitioners when it comes to HR news, thought leadership, legal compliance and emerging trends. Unlock premium membership to receive:
Full access to our news library Breaking news updates each day Complimentary passes to all webinars Webcasts streaming on demand Q&A sessions on hot topics And much more