Log in or become a subscriber

This content requires HR Daily Premium membership. Log in below or sign up here.

HR officer misinterpreted "illegal instruction" to discriminate

An HR officer who claimed she was forced to quit after being "instructed" to discriminate against women actually "misconstrued" the situation, the Fair Work Commission has found.

The Uconnex HR compliance officer claimed unfair dismissal following her resignation late last year, but the employer objected, arguing her decision was voluntary.

The Commission heard that in early December, the HR officer recruited an employee to start work as soon as possible. When it came time to onboard the new recruit on 14 December, the employer discovered she had given birth two days prior and therefore wasn't fit for duties at that time.

The employer's chief operating officer questioned why the HR team wasn't aware the new recruit was about to have a baby, and the HR officer responded that she could "only see someone's head and not their body" when interviewing...

Log in or become a subscriber
Subscriber login

Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.

HR Daily Premium membership

Sign up now for all the benefits of HR Daily Premium membership.

Join here to stay informed

HR Daily Premium members are Australia's best-informed HR leaders and practitioners when it comes to HR news, thought leadership, legal compliance and emerging trends. Unlock premium membership to receive:

Full access to our news library Breaking news updates each day Complimentary passes to all webinars Webcasts streaming on demand Q&A sessions on hot topics And much more