Log in or become a subscriber

This content requires HR Daily Premium membership. Log in below or sign up here.

HR's scrutiny of bullying complaints was "necessary and appropriate"

An HR consultant took necessary and appropriate steps to examine an employee's own conduct when determining whether her bullying and other allegations had a "proper foundation", the Federal Court has ruled.

This approach didn't refocus the investigation on the employee, nor alter her position to her detriment, Justice Craig Colvin found, in rejecting her $52 million adverse action claim.

The Court heard that in March 2019, the Department of Human Services employee sent a lengthy email to the people and culture team, describing various incidents of alleged bullying by a colleague.

She expressed frustration that the issues had been ongoing for about 12 months and were delaying her approval for overtime work and a promotion, but managers were "not able to get a handle of the ongoing negativity"...

Log in or become a subscriber
Subscriber login

Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.

HR Daily Premium membership

Sign up now for all the benefits of HR Daily Premium membership.

Join here to stay informed

HR Daily Premium members are Australia's best-informed HR leaders and practitioners when it comes to HR news, thought leadership, legal compliance and emerging trends. Unlock premium membership to receive:

Full access to our news library Breaking news updates each day Complimentary passes to all webinars Webcasts streaming on demand Q&A sessions on hot topics And much more