Log in or become a subscriber

This content requires HR Daily Premium membership. Log in below or sign up here.

Inadequate D&A policy training undermines employer's reinstatement appeal

A Fair Work Commission full bench has denied an employer permission to appeal against reinstating a sacked worker, ruling there were no errors in a previous finding that the dismissal was valid, but unreasonable.

In February this year, FWC Deputy President Judith Wright found Hutchison Ports Sydney had unfairly dismissed an employee who breached the company's drug and alcohol policy by blowing over the allowable BAC limit of 0.00.

The Commission heard that the employee consumed a glass of wine 30 minutes before commencing his shift on 31 March 2024. After being involved in an on-site accident, he was breath tested, returning an initial blood alcohol concentration reading of 0.025, then a confirmatory BAC reading of 0.017.

At the time of the incident, the company's D&A policy specified that the allowable BAC reading for where the employee worked was 0.00. However, this had changed from 0.02 just a few weeks earlier...

Log in or become a subscriber
Subscriber login

Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.

HR Daily Premium membership

Sign up now for all the benefits of HR Daily Premium membership.

Join here to stay informed

HR Daily Premium members are Australia's best-informed HR leaders and practitioners when it comes to HR news, thought leadership, legal compliance and emerging trends. Unlock premium membership to receive:

Full access to our news library Breaking news updates each day Complimentary passes to all webinars Webcasts streaming on demand Q&A sessions on hot topics And much more