Log in or become a subscriber

This content requires HR Daily Premium membership. Log in below or sign up here.

Mentally ill worker's return posed "serious" safety risk

The safety risks posed by an employee who was acting "aggressively and erratically" due to a serious mental illness outweighed the procedural flaws in his employer's dismissal process, the Fair Work Commission has found.

In unfair dismissal proceedings, the Commission heard the Defend Fire Services fire technician returned to work in December last year after a period of absence due to mental health issues, and performed duties for about four days.

Because the employer required his work vehicle, he said he felt "forced" to return despite knowing he was not ready, "not right" and "not the same person".

The employee was sacked a few weeks later for serious misconduct, with the employer alleging he'd taken lengthy absences from work without reasonable grounds, sent an abusive text to his supervisor, and concealed a tool in a work vehicle despite having been asked to return it...

Log in or become a subscriber
Subscriber login

Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.

HR Daily Premium membership

Sign up now for all the benefits of HR Daily Premium membership.

Join here to stay informed

HR Daily Premium members are Australia's best-informed HR leaders and practitioners when it comes to HR news, thought leadership, legal compliance and emerging trends. Unlock premium membership to receive:

Full access to our news library Breaking news updates each day Complimentary passes to all webinars Webcasts streaming on demand Q&A sessions on hot topics And much more