This content requires HR Daily Premium membership. Log in below or sign up here.
Even if certain negative behaviours were "manifestations" of an employee's autism spectrum disorder, they weren't a substantial and operative reason for her dismissal, the Fair Work Commission has ruled.
Rather, several managers believed the employee had knowingly engaged in serious misconduct that warranted dismissal, Commissioner Benjamin Redford found, while adding their assumption about her intentions was "most unfair".
Victoria's Independent Broad-Based Anti-Corruption Commission dismissed the service desk analyst in January this year, for accessing a colleague's sign-in logs in breach of its code of conduct and workplace policies.
She lodged a general protections dismissal dispute, arguing the real reason she was sacked was because she had made workplace complaints or enquiries, and that her dismissal was "inextricably linked" to her autism spectrum disorder (ASD)...
Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.
Sign up now for all the benefits of HR Daily Premium membership.
HR Daily Premium members are Australia's best-informed HR leaders and practitioners when it comes to HR news, thought leadership, legal compliance and emerging trends. Unlock premium membership to receive:
Full access to our news library Breaking news updates each day Complimentary passes to all webinars Webcasts streaming on demand Q&A sessions on hot topics And much more