Log in or become a subscriber

This content requires HR Daily Premium membership. Log in below or sign up here.

P&C leader's dismissal decision "infected" by prohibited reasons

A P&C leader's heavy reliance on a manager's dismissal recommendation, without independently verifying her concerns, has undermined an employer's defence of an adverse action claim.

The employee's dismissal was unlawful, not because of the P&C leader's state of mind, but because the manager failed to prove her recommendation wasn't based on prohibited reasons, Federal Circuit Court Judge Leigh Johns found.

The Lifeview Willow Wood employee – a residential wellness manager – was sacked in January 2025, three weeks before her probation period was due to end. She subsequently lodged a general protections claim, alleging her dismissal was prompted by her workplace complaints and enquiries.

The employee claimed she'd exercised workplace rights when she sent five emails that raised "legitimate concerns" about unsafe or inadequate staffing, clinical documentation, incident reviews, staff allocation, lateness, pay and hours...

Log in or become a subscriber
Subscriber login

Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.

HR Daily Premium membership

Sign up now for all the benefits of HR Daily Premium membership.

Join here to stay informed

HR Daily Premium members are Australia's best-informed HR leaders and practitioners when it comes to HR news, thought leadership, legal compliance and emerging trends. Unlock premium membership to receive:

Full access to our news library Breaking news updates each day Complimentary passes to all webinars Webcasts streaming on demand Q&A sessions on hot topics And much more