Log in or become a subscriber

This content requires HR Daily Premium membership. Log in below or sign up here.

Refused direction wasn't reasonable; sacking was harsh and unjust

It was possible an employer wasn't aware of a worker's injury when it directed him to perform a task beyond his capacity, but dismissing him for refusing was harsh and unreasonable, the Fair Work Commission has ruled.

In May this year the employee, a nut roaster for food retailer Harkola Pty Ltd, was directed by the employer's chief operations manager to operate a tumbler machine.

He refused, on the basis he had a work-related injury that excused him from operating the tumbler machine or lifting anything heavy.

Three days later, he was advised that his employment had been terminated...

Log in or become a subscriber
Subscriber login

Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.

HR Daily Premium membership

Sign up now for all the benefits of HR Daily Premium membership.

Join here to stay informed

HR Daily Premium members are Australia's best-informed HR leaders and practitioners when it comes to HR news, thought leadership, legal compliance and emerging trends. Unlock premium membership to receive:

Full access to our news library Breaking news updates each day Complimentary passes to all webinars Webcasts streaming on demand Q&A sessions on hot topics And much more