This content requires HR Daily Premium membership. Log in below or sign up here.
The Fair Work Commission has confirmed that it can't arbitrate a flexible work dispute about a request that was made one month before the employee met the eligibility criteria.
Commissioner Sarah McKinnon found that even though the employee had met the relevant criteria by the time of his dispute application, his request for different work arrangements wasn't validly made, and therefore she had no jurisdiction to deal with it.
The employee made his request on 7 April this year, prior to his 55th birthday, and shortly after Sydney Water Corporation issued a requirement for its workforce to be 'on site' three days per week.
He sought to work his full-time hours over four days, with one day in the Ryde office, another day in his "primary" office in Parramatta, and the other two days at home.
The compressed week would allow him to become more involved in community activities, such as volunteering at the local Men's Shed, he said. Further, working remotely two days per week would enable him to undertake regular exercise, supporting his health and wellbeing...
Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.
Sign up now for all the benefits of HR Daily Premium membership.
HR Daily Premium members are Australia's best-informed HR leaders and practitioners when it comes to HR news, thought leadership, legal compliance and emerging trends. Unlock premium membership to receive:
Full access to our news library Breaking news updates each day Complimentary passes to all webinars Webcasts streaming on demand Q&A sessions on hot topics And much more