This content requires HR Daily Premium membership. Log in below or sign up here.
The "optics" would be poor if an employer retained a senior employee who was convicted of domestic violence, a commission has found in rejecting his unfair dismissal appeal.
The employer didn't act "harshly or oppressively" when it refused to consider alternatives to dismissal, particularly given the employee's integrity-based role and lack of remorse for his conduct, the Western Australian Industrial Relations Commission found.
In September last year, the Public Sector Commission senior consultant was sentenced to 12 months' jail, suspended for 18 months, after a jury convicted him of aggravated common assault. The offence related to the "non-fatal strangulation" of his former wife, which occurred in front of their children.
During sentencing, the District Court judge said the employee's conduct was "an abuse of trust", noting this type of offending happened "far too frequently" and was "a scourge on society"...
Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.
Sign up now for all the benefits of HR Daily Premium membership.
HR Daily Premium members are Australia's best-informed HR leaders and practitioners when it comes to HR news, thought leadership, legal compliance and emerging trends. Unlock premium membership to receive:
Full access to our news library Breaking news updates each day Complimentary passes to all webinars Webcasts streaming on demand Q&A sessions on hot topics And much more