Log in or become a subscriber

This content requires HR Daily Premium membership. Log in below or sign up here.

Sacking employee after 'scope of duties' complaint was GP breach

Dismissing an employee because he wouldn't agree to his image or voice being shared on social media, unless he was paid extra for it, amounted to unlawful adverse action, the Federal Circuit Court has ruled.

The employer argued this "attitude" meant he wasn't a "suitable long-term employee", but Judge Heather Riley found this was an admission that it had acted because he had made a complaint or inquiry related to his employment.

The Asia Vacation Group travel sales consultant claimed that shortly after joining the employer on 17 June 2024, it asked him to participate in a podcast about travel in Japan.

After the podcast was published on its YouTube channel on 4 July, the employer asked for his consent to use some of the material to make a one-minute video that it would share on other social media platforms...

Log in or become a subscriber
Subscriber login

Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.

HR Daily Premium membership

Sign up now for all the benefits of HR Daily Premium membership.

Join here to stay informed

HR Daily Premium members are Australia's best-informed HR leaders and practitioners when it comes to HR news, thought leadership, legal compliance and emerging trends. Unlock premium membership to receive:

Full access to our news library Breaking news updates each day Complimentary passes to all webinars Webcasts streaming on demand Q&A sessions on hot topics And much more