Log in or become a subscriber

This content requires HR Daily Premium membership. Log in below or sign up here.

Sacking employee who "hijacked" meeting was warranted

An employee who "hijacked" a meeting and then resigned in the heat of the moment has lost his unfair dismissal claim, after the Fair Work Commission accepted he engaged in serious misconduct that warranted termination.

Noting the employer should have confirmed the employee's decision after he'd calmed down, instead of immediately accepting his resignation, Commissioner Paul Schneider nonetheless found it had reasonable grounds to sack him.

The Pek Care employee claimed his dismissal in September 2024 was unfair, but the employer objected on the basis he had resigned. Alternatively, it said, his employment ended due to his serious misconduct during a meeting the week before...

Log in or become a subscriber
Subscriber login

Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.

HR Daily Premium membership

Sign up now for all the benefits of HR Daily Premium membership.

Join here to stay informed

HR Daily Premium members are Australia's best-informed HR leaders and practitioners when it comes to HR news, thought leadership, legal compliance and emerging trends. Unlock premium membership to receive:

Full access to our news library Breaking news updates each day Complimentary passes to all webinars Webcasts streaming on demand Q&A sessions on hot topics And much more