This content requires HR Daily Premium membership. Log in below or sign up here.
Despite failing to help a manager deal with a "complicated" parental leave situation, an employer has proved it didn't take unlawful adverse action against an employee, the Federal Circuit Court has ruled.
The employee's sense of ill-treatment and betrayal was "entirely justified", Judge Lisa Doust said, but her employment ended because of "shoddy management", not because of her pregnancy or family responsibilities.
The employee was a part-time crew member at Burger Urge's Forster store, between March 2024 and late August that year, when she stopped working shortly before her baby was due to arrive.
In adverse action proceedings, the employee told the Court she had multiple conversations with an assistant manager in June and July, about her intention to take unpaid parental leave for six months before returning to her role...
Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.
Sign up now for all the benefits of HR Daily Premium membership.
HR Daily Premium members are Australia's best-informed HR leaders and practitioners when it comes to HR news, thought leadership, legal compliance and emerging trends. Unlock premium membership to receive:
Full access to our news library Breaking news updates each day Complimentary passes to all webinars Webcasts streaming on demand Q&A sessions on hot topics And much more