Log in or become a subscriber

This content requires HR Daily Premium membership. Log in below or sign up here.

"Strict literal adherence" to PIP wasn't reasonable action

Requiring an employee to adhere to her performance improvement plan "to the letter" was "so lacking in fairness and flexibility" that it wasn't objectively reasonable, a commission has ruled in psychological injury proceedings.

It appeared the employer could "improvise flexibility" around the PIP for its own purposes, but not for the employee, NSW Personal Injury Commission Member Jeffrey Gabriel said.

The trade activation and marketing manager, for international beverage company DBG (Australia) Pty Ltd, sought workers' compensation for an adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood, which she claimed was caused by workplace bullying.

The employer's insurer denied liability. It accepted she had sustained a work-related injury, but considered it was the result of reasonable actions with respect to performance appraisal...

Log in or become a subscriber
Subscriber login

Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.

HR Daily Premium membership

Sign up now for all the benefits of HR Daily Premium membership.

Join here to stay informed

HR Daily Premium members are Australia's best-informed HR leaders and practitioners when it comes to HR news, thought leadership, legal compliance and emerging trends. Unlock premium membership to receive:

Full access to our news library Breaking news updates each day Complimentary passes to all webinars Webcasts streaming on demand Q&A sessions on hot topics And much more